Number of prior live births is associated with higher arterial stiffness but not its change in older women: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study.

Introduction: Although studies have demonstrated a J-shaped association between parity and cardiovascular disease (CVD), the association with arterial stiffness is not fully understood. Methods: We examined the association between parity and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), a measure of central arterial stiffness. We conducted a longitudinal analysis of 1220 women (mean age 73.7 years) who attended the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study visit 5 (2011-2013). At visit 2 (1990-1992), women self-reported parity (number of prior live births), which we categorized as: 0 (never pregnant or pregnant with no live births); 1-2 (referent); 3-4; and 5+ live births. Technicians measured cfPWV at visit 5 (2011-2013) and visit 6 or 7 (2016-2019). Multivariable linear regression modeled the associations of parity with visit 5 cfPWV and cfPWV change between visit 5 and 6/7 adjusted for demographics and potential confounding factors. Results: Participants reported 0 (7.7%), 1-2 (38.7%), 3-4 (40.0%), or 5+ (13.6%) prior live births. In adjusted analyses, women with 5+ live births had a higher visit 5 cfPWV (ß=50.6 cm/s, 95% confidence interval: 3.6, 97.7 cm/s) than those with 1-2 live births. No statistically significant associations were observed for other parity groups with visit 5 cfPWV or with cfPWV change. Discussion: In later life, women with 5+ live births had higher arterial stiffness than those with 1-2 live births, but cfPWV change did not differ by parity, suggesting women with 5+ live births should be targeted for early primary prevention of CVD given their higher arterial stiffness at later-life.

Development and Validation of an Eating-Related Eco-Concern Questionnaire.

Eco-concern, the distress experienced relating to climate change, is associated with mental health, yet no study has examined disordered eating related to eco-concern. This study developed and validated a 10-item scale assessing Eating-Related Eco-Concern (EREC). Participants (n = 224) completed the EREC, Climate Change Worry Scale (CCWS), and Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q). Construct validity, convergent validity, and internal consistency were evaluated. Sex differences in EREC were evaluated using t-tests. Associations among the EREC, CCWS, and EDE-Q were evaluated using linear regression models. Sensitivity analyses were conducted in individuals below EDE-Q global score clinical cut-offs. Factor analysis suggested that all items loaded adequately onto one factor. Pearson's correlation and Bland-Altman analyses suggested strong correlation and acceptable agreement between the EREC and CCWS (r = 0.57), but weak correlation and low agreement with the EDE-Q global score (r = 0.14). The EREC had acceptable internal consistency (α = 0.88). No sex difference was observed in the EREC in the full sample; females had a significantly higher mean score than males in sensitivity analysis. The EREC was significantly positively associated with the CCWS and EDE-Q global and shape concern scores, but not in sensitivity analysis. The EREC is a brief, validated scale that can be useful to screen for eating-related eco-concern.